Effectiveness
Criticism from Dragonfly75
http://www.dragonfly75.com/eng/klemensP.html
http://www.dragonfly75.com/eng/klemensP.html
Reply to Dragonfly
Dragonfly wrote those comments in about 2006 .
He wonders how it is that we run the Super Pulser so fast. For 3 years other pulser manufactures said on the internet that it could not be done, that was back in 2000.
Dragonfly proposes three possibilities but they are not very scientific at all. Perhaps if he was to purchase one of our pulsers, he would not have to guess if it such speeds are possible or not.
If you start guessing how it is possible, how can you get the right answer, as it is all based on assumptions, and some of his assumptions are quite off the scale.
Dragonfly seems to put a lot of energy into criticising the Klemens pulser, but it is not a scientific way that produces true research or evidence to support and advertise his own pulser.
The quality of Dragonfly's pulser is also in question and it seems that might be why it’s a third of the price of the Klemens pulser. Dragonfly does not sell that same pulser anymore. He had not complied with safety standards anywhere and if someone used that pulser they might receive a 300 volt shock. Building, advertising and selling such a dangerous device is not legal. Apart from that, such poor safety standards would also provide the drug companies with a good excuse to target the Beck equipment and prevent their production on grounds of safety.
In his 'research,' Dragonfly did not do comparative pulser tests on any physical conditions, which is really the most important test of all.
I personally performed comparative tests on 3 different units. At that time, we had received 2 of the best independent recommendations on the internet as mentioned on our web site. Our pulsers were recommended by Cancer tutor and Walter Last. Dragonfly had none of his recommended, that I am aware of.
We also have many positive testimonies from customers who have purchased our machines. I received Sota’s testimonies when I purchased their original unit. Although the Sota works fine, it was so slow. That is why we tried to build a faster unit. It proved to work not only faster but better from my own experience and from the reports others have shared with me. Some of the people who shared their reports were ex-Sota agents. We were quite amazed with the extrordinary results that our units were producing rather than getting bogged down with what the other manufacturers were doing to market their pulsers. They concentrated on gauss and coin flipping whereas we were more concerned with its effectiveness to produce physiological results.
We have put information our website that should answer most questions about what is mentioned by Dragonfly.
When Sota measured our unit, they did not measure it from the copper coil face but rather from the face of the outside protective structural coating which was approximately 15 mm from the coil. However, when they measured their own Sota pulser, they measured it from their outside protective covering which was only 2mm thick.
It would be unreasonable to expect that Sota would provide a favourable report of our pulsers, but it is disappointing that they actually provided a deceptive report. Sota should not be expected to provide a favourable report of their competitors' machines. The Sota units were manufactured to operate at such low speeds and for short periods of time to ensure that their coils did not become hot. The reason for this was that, if the coild became hot, it would melt through the 2mm thin plastic covering. In contrast, our units require a stronger power supply in order to operate at hgh speeds. This situation creates enormous heat, which results in coil expansion. To prevent the protective coating from cracking open, our pulsers are reinforced with thick polyester resin around the coil. If our coils were coated only with a 2mm plastic coating, it would melt through the plasitic coating in 15 minutes and crack the polyester coil casing open.
Dragonfly's article was written in about 2006, but he has added some extra points recently again without actually seeing either the original Super Pulser or the current Ultra Pulsa to my knowledge.
In my tests, all strengths were measured using a LUTRON E.M.F. Electromagnetic Field Radiation Tester
All gauss measurements were taken 2mm distance from the copper coil.
I measured 2mm from our coil as I knew that Sota’s paddle had a 2 mm plastic coating over its coil and I didn’t want to break it open to compare all units from the surface of the bare copper coil.
Our original SUPER PULSER speed at 5 pulse /sec 6000 mgauss
Our original SUPER PULSER speed at 25 pulses /sec 28,000 mgauss
That is why we claimed it was 6 times more powerful when in actual fact it’s a 8.2 times higher reading
(28,000 divided by 3,400 is 8.2 )
Sota pulser one pulse every 3.5 seconds 3,400 mgauss
Beck Flash camera do it yourself 580 mgauss
Another Australian Manufacturer 560 mgauss
Its important to note that every millimetre makes a huge difference to the readings.
Now it is commonly assumed that the pulser's effectiveness is only on the surface of the coil but I also compared the Sota to the original Klemens pulser at full speed at 300 mm distance and at that distance they both measured the same gauss reading.
One has to consider the obvious situation - If these slow speed units were actually effective, why isn’t the internet filled with their testimonies? Our customers are happy to share their many positive experiences using the Klemens pulsers and some of these remarkable testimonials appear in various places on the internet. We also receive many positive testimonials from our customers by email and phone. With our customer's consent, many of these testimonials are supplied to new customers after they purchase a Klemens pulser. As we understand, legally we are not permitted to present testimonials prior to a sale.
Dragonfly wrote those comments in about 2006 .
He wonders how it is that we run the Super Pulser so fast. For 3 years other pulser manufactures said on the internet that it could not be done, that was back in 2000.
Dragonfly proposes three possibilities but they are not very scientific at all. Perhaps if he was to purchase one of our pulsers, he would not have to guess if it such speeds are possible or not.
If you start guessing how it is possible, how can you get the right answer, as it is all based on assumptions, and some of his assumptions are quite off the scale.
Dragonfly seems to put a lot of energy into criticising the Klemens pulser, but it is not a scientific way that produces true research or evidence to support and advertise his own pulser.
The quality of Dragonfly's pulser is also in question and it seems that might be why it’s a third of the price of the Klemens pulser. Dragonfly does not sell that same pulser anymore. He had not complied with safety standards anywhere and if someone used that pulser they might receive a 300 volt shock. Building, advertising and selling such a dangerous device is not legal. Apart from that, such poor safety standards would also provide the drug companies with a good excuse to target the Beck equipment and prevent their production on grounds of safety.
In his 'research,' Dragonfly did not do comparative pulser tests on any physical conditions, which is really the most important test of all.
I personally performed comparative tests on 3 different units. At that time, we had received 2 of the best independent recommendations on the internet as mentioned on our web site. Our pulsers were recommended by Cancer tutor and Walter Last. Dragonfly had none of his recommended, that I am aware of.
We also have many positive testimonies from customers who have purchased our machines. I received Sota’s testimonies when I purchased their original unit. Although the Sota works fine, it was so slow. That is why we tried to build a faster unit. It proved to work not only faster but better from my own experience and from the reports others have shared with me. Some of the people who shared their reports were ex-Sota agents. We were quite amazed with the extrordinary results that our units were producing rather than getting bogged down with what the other manufacturers were doing to market their pulsers. They concentrated on gauss and coin flipping whereas we were more concerned with its effectiveness to produce physiological results.
We have put information our website that should answer most questions about what is mentioned by Dragonfly.
When Sota measured our unit, they did not measure it from the copper coil face but rather from the face of the outside protective structural coating which was approximately 15 mm from the coil. However, when they measured their own Sota pulser, they measured it from their outside protective covering which was only 2mm thick.
It would be unreasonable to expect that Sota would provide a favourable report of our pulsers, but it is disappointing that they actually provided a deceptive report. Sota should not be expected to provide a favourable report of their competitors' machines. The Sota units were manufactured to operate at such low speeds and for short periods of time to ensure that their coils did not become hot. The reason for this was that, if the coild became hot, it would melt through the 2mm thin plastic covering. In contrast, our units require a stronger power supply in order to operate at hgh speeds. This situation creates enormous heat, which results in coil expansion. To prevent the protective coating from cracking open, our pulsers are reinforced with thick polyester resin around the coil. If our coils were coated only with a 2mm plastic coating, it would melt through the plasitic coating in 15 minutes and crack the polyester coil casing open.
Dragonfly's article was written in about 2006, but he has added some extra points recently again without actually seeing either the original Super Pulser or the current Ultra Pulsa to my knowledge.
In my tests, all strengths were measured using a LUTRON E.M.F. Electromagnetic Field Radiation Tester
All gauss measurements were taken 2mm distance from the copper coil.
I measured 2mm from our coil as I knew that Sota’s paddle had a 2 mm plastic coating over its coil and I didn’t want to break it open to compare all units from the surface of the bare copper coil.
Our original SUPER PULSER speed at 5 pulse /sec 6000 mgauss
Our original SUPER PULSER speed at 25 pulses /sec 28,000 mgauss
That is why we claimed it was 6 times more powerful when in actual fact it’s a 8.2 times higher reading
(28,000 divided by 3,400 is 8.2 )
Sota pulser one pulse every 3.5 seconds 3,400 mgauss
Beck Flash camera do it yourself 580 mgauss
Another Australian Manufacturer 560 mgauss
Its important to note that every millimetre makes a huge difference to the readings.
Now it is commonly assumed that the pulser's effectiveness is only on the surface of the coil but I also compared the Sota to the original Klemens pulser at full speed at 300 mm distance and at that distance they both measured the same gauss reading.
One has to consider the obvious situation - If these slow speed units were actually effective, why isn’t the internet filled with their testimonies? Our customers are happy to share their many positive experiences using the Klemens pulsers and some of these remarkable testimonials appear in various places on the internet. We also receive many positive testimonials from our customers by email and phone. With our customer's consent, many of these testimonials are supplied to new customers after they purchase a Klemens pulser. As we understand, legally we are not permitted to present testimonials prior to a sale.
Coin-Flipping & Gauss
Criticism from Draganpcg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4P1N8uDJXU8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4P1N8uDJXU8
Reply to Criticisms About Coin-Flipping & Gauss
The effectiveness of the unit is not in the guass but in the frequency of the pulse.
Some companies are presenting false information and it is confusing for customers.
I measured the different pulsers on the market and came up with the following information.
In answer to the question about gauss, I need to explain certain marketing claims on the internet.
There are inconsistencies in the claims made by various companies and in order to give a fair response to the enquires made by our customers, who are trying to make meaning out of what is claimed, I have come up with my way of giving what I believe is a fair comparison.
I compared these pulsers:
1. Standard Beck do it yourself Pulser
2. Another Australian manufacturer’s pulser
3. A Canadian manufacturer’s pulser,
4. Our Super Magnetic Pulsers
I ran mine on slow speed and all at 2mm from the Coil.
All strengths are measured using a LUTRON E.M.F. [Electromagnetic Field Radiation Tester] Gauss Meter measuring surface magnetic field.
We use a 25volt ac power pack and in the circuitry we use a voltage doubler, which goes to 58 volts DC. We decided to do the opposite to everyone else to achieve a faster speed. Instead of going high voltage and low current we went to high current and low voltage. Our power pack is huge compared to the tiny Sota’s power pack. Don't get me wrong as the Sota is a good pulser and it originally helped me get my health back.
I was told by a Sota dealer in Australia that the Sota made their coils so close to the margin they had a lot of problems with coil burnout. We have never had one burn out.
Our units will be rated at 110VAC for Canadian & USA clients and will have the correct plug to fit your power sockets. The pulses from this unit are variable (by turning the dial) and can be set from 3 to 124 pulses per second (Klemens Ultra Pulsa).
When I tried our prototype (Super T Pulser) out on the very first day, I noticed a huge difference in effectiveness. Regards comparing pulsers, the Sota is like a single shot rife while our previous model, the Super T Pulser is a machine gun. I used the Sota on my kidneys for about 30 minutes to receive 50% relief. I was happy with that as nothing else helped.
When I tried our new Super T Pulser, I received total relief in 5 minutes. I was aghast. What was this fast speed unit doing to achieve such amazing results? We have had report after report with some similar results and some even more staggering. I know from owing a Sota that it does not compare with these type of achievements. One of our customers had three compound fractures - broken bones in her arm and wrist and after putting the Super Pulser on the injuries immediately, she did not even have one bit of swelling or bruising. Our current most powerful model, the Klemens Ultra Pulsa is double the speed of the Super Pulser. The Klemens Ultra Pulsa has a high speed of 148 pulses per second. The Klemens Spectrum Pulser has a maximum speed of 180 pulses per second and we find it to be the most effective machine on the market.
The effectiveness of the unit is not in the guass but in the frequency of the pulse.
Some companies are presenting false information and it is confusing for customers.
I measured the different pulsers on the market and came up with the following information.
In answer to the question about gauss, I need to explain certain marketing claims on the internet.
There are inconsistencies in the claims made by various companies and in order to give a fair response to the enquires made by our customers, who are trying to make meaning out of what is claimed, I have come up with my way of giving what I believe is a fair comparison.
I compared these pulsers:
1. Standard Beck do it yourself Pulser
2. Another Australian manufacturer’s pulser
3. A Canadian manufacturer’s pulser,
4. Our Super Magnetic Pulsers
I ran mine on slow speed and all at 2mm from the Coil.
All strengths are measured using a LUTRON E.M.F. [Electromagnetic Field Radiation Tester] Gauss Meter measuring surface magnetic field.
- Beck pulser 560 mgauss
- Other Australian brand 580 mgauss
- Canadian pulser 3,400 mgauss
- Klemens Super T – 6,000 to 28,000 mgauss
- Klemens Super P – 6,000 to 36,000 mgauss
- Klemens Ultra Pulsa (2017 model)- at 10 pulses/sec; at 6,000 mgauss and at 124 pulses/sec 56,000 mgauss
- Klemens Ultra Pulsa (2019 model) - at 10 pulses/sec; at 6,000 mgauss and at 148 pulses/sec 65,000 mgauss (approx)
- Klemens Spectrum (2020 model) - at 10 pulses/sec; at 6 mgauss and at 180 pulses/sec 88,000 mguass (approx)
We use a 25volt ac power pack and in the circuitry we use a voltage doubler, which goes to 58 volts DC. We decided to do the opposite to everyone else to achieve a faster speed. Instead of going high voltage and low current we went to high current and low voltage. Our power pack is huge compared to the tiny Sota’s power pack. Don't get me wrong as the Sota is a good pulser and it originally helped me get my health back.
I was told by a Sota dealer in Australia that the Sota made their coils so close to the margin they had a lot of problems with coil burnout. We have never had one burn out.
Our units will be rated at 110VAC for Canadian & USA clients and will have the correct plug to fit your power sockets. The pulses from this unit are variable (by turning the dial) and can be set from 3 to 124 pulses per second (Klemens Ultra Pulsa).
When I tried our prototype (Super T Pulser) out on the very first day, I noticed a huge difference in effectiveness. Regards comparing pulsers, the Sota is like a single shot rife while our previous model, the Super T Pulser is a machine gun. I used the Sota on my kidneys for about 30 minutes to receive 50% relief. I was happy with that as nothing else helped.
When I tried our new Super T Pulser, I received total relief in 5 minutes. I was aghast. What was this fast speed unit doing to achieve such amazing results? We have had report after report with some similar results and some even more staggering. I know from owing a Sota that it does not compare with these type of achievements. One of our customers had three compound fractures - broken bones in her arm and wrist and after putting the Super Pulser on the injuries immediately, she did not even have one bit of swelling or bruising. Our current most powerful model, the Klemens Ultra Pulsa is double the speed of the Super Pulser. The Klemens Ultra Pulsa has a high speed of 148 pulses per second. The Klemens Spectrum Pulser has a maximum speed of 180 pulses per second and we find it to be the most effective machine on the market.
Contact
Klemens Pulsers
Phone: 61 7 4157 9962
Mobile: 61 407 257 453
31 Old Cedars Road
South Bingera Q 4670
email: klemensanton0@gmail.com
Klemens Pulsers
Phone: 61 7 4157 9962
Mobile: 61 407 257 453
31 Old Cedars Road
South Bingera Q 4670
email: klemensanton0@gmail.com